Post-Mortem-CPR
Project
Projects should be planned carefully
to ensure that the deliverables are met. As such, certain elements are
essential during the planning process. For example, these elements include
defining the project, developing a plan, and deliver the project in a timely
manner within budget constraints. Last year, I was contacted by a CPR
instructor and asked to participate in a project with her to train 75 teachers
in CPR and then certify them as CPR instructors.
A needs analysis was conducted
through a survey of teachers to determine how many were already certified, how
many held an expired certification and how many were already CPR instructors at
some point. This was important information
to understand where the training should begin. Would there need to be a novice
class, an intermediate class for those who had been certified in the past and
then how many would need to be taught how to be an instructor verses those who
just needed to demonstrate technique and show class rosters of participants?
I met with the instructor who had
hired me and did a little planning and looked at the survey results. All
teachers had been certified in the past yet no one had ever been certified as
an instructor. We determined we needed three sessions.
Part 1: Demonstrate CPR to the group,
practice with the group, and certify the group in CPR.
Part 2: Certify the teacher on how to
train the students including the use of videos, worksheets, rubrics and
grading.
Part 3: Train the teachers on how to
complete and submit the student rosters. ( This allows the student to then be
certified in CPR)
I was a co trainer, so I assumed that
the instructor would be prepared for the training. We did not have a brainstorming session that
defined our roles. We were not creating deliverables but were planning to
execute the ones already in place. We spoke briefly about what she wanted me to
do.
My job duties included:
- Unpack and assemble the mannequins, the manuals, the videos and the face shields.
- Set up the sign in rosters for the teachers.
- Observe teachers as they demonstrate technique and check off the tasks on the rubric.
- Assist 4 groups of 4 students each (16 teachers) on being an instructor. This includes planning instruction for the other student in the class.
Problems:
The instructor did not check the
school that we were using for training to see if they had working technology
for the videos, such as projector and screen or television and DVD player. This
was not available in the room and the time delay in searching for this set us
back by 45 minutes. The rosters and the rubrics were not printed prior to the
teacher’s arrival. We both arrived 1 hour early to set up. I was unfamiliar
with the type of mannequins that the instructor had and it took me much longer
than expected to set up the mannequins for practice.
Most of this could have been avoided
by simply creating an implementation strategy and ensuring that the
deliverables and the technology was ready. This project also had multiple
objectives and multiple tasks that included certification and instructor
requirements. This training could be better by following the Phases of the
Project Management:
- Planning-We could have met to enhance communication.
- Scheduling-This phase is to coordinate people and resources to achieve the goals of the training.
- Controlling-Monitoring progress of the project by anticipation of problems and have backup plans
- Terminating-taking action to prevent problems in the future. Evaluation of the instructor is critical for improving.
The project manager needs to be
flexible, identify impacts of changes, and communicate the advantages and
disadvantages of the change. (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton, &
Kramer, 2008)
References:
Lin, H. (2006). Instructional project management: An emerging
professional practice for design and training programs. Workforce Education
Forum, 33(2).Reprinted by permission of the author.
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M.,
Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008).Project management: Planning,
scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.
Hi Sonya,
ReplyDeleteI would say that in your example, the issue that happened was linked to the “vague or nonexistent role and responsibility definitions” pitfall as described by Portny et al. (2008). You logically assumed that the main instructor would be prepared, which he should have, and he might have thought that it was part of your job to do so. Better communication would definitely have helped in the process to ensure that everyone knows what they need to do and avoid this kind of situation.
References
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thanks Laury, I agree and will be in the future.
ReplyDelete